Re: Obsolete labels

[Werner LEMBERG]

> I noticed that there are some obsolete ones that should be deleted:
> 
>  * Task: I *think* this comes from "Type: Task" on SourceForge and
>    never had issues.
>  * Cant_verify: As we don't do verification anymore, I don't think
>    there's much gain from labeling one open and two closed issues.
>  * Frog: Does this still provide value?

+1

> Furthermore, the following labels have very few issues. I'd propose
> we delete them because having less labels will make it easier to
> find the right one:
> 
>  * Encoding: one closed issue about BOM signatures, fixed in 2.15.10
>  * Dynamics: one open issue, title mentions dynamics
>  * Autochange: one open issue, "Enhancement: autochange
>    improvements"
>  * Tablature: one open & one closed issue, titles mention tablatures

+1

> Moreover, I find issues in Emmentaler, Font_handling and
> Glyph_handling very confusing: While Emmentaler seems like a rather
> recent invention of Werner and makes sense to me, Font_handling and
> Glyph_handling overlap and I'd actually label some of the issues as
> Emmentaler- related. I'd propose we merge these two labels, call it
> "Fonts", and put into the description that everything related to
> Emmentaler should go there.

+1

> Lastly, I don't like "-Wconversion" because it starts with a hyphen and
> is very specific. Can we rename this to "Compiler warnings" or just re-
> label the issues and MRs into Build and / or Maintainability?

+1 for 'Build' because it's shorter

Thanks for working on this.


    Werner