|
From: | Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: | Re: Please review Pygments lexer and style |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:03:35 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
Le 23/06/2021 à 18:53, Dan Eble a écrit :
On Jun 23, 2021, at 10:33, Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:Le 23/06/2021 à 09:58, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :To whet your appetite, a highlighted version of the test file included in the PR is attached.Not sure why the HTML hasn't gotten through email — on the archives and in Dan's mailbox it appears as plain LilyPond code. Here are additional RTF and SVG versions. Jean <example.ly><example.html><example.rtf><example.svg>Not a bad idea, but -1 for the use of light colors on white: silver, yellow, sky blue, etc. What is the minimum set of distinctions that is likely to do more good than harm? The example is a little overwhelming. (All MHO.)
I should probably find something else for pitches and durations. The example does look overwhelming, but it was intentionally constructed as a showcase for many pieces of syntax and builtins. A typical score mostly consists of long runs of pitches and durations interspersed with articulations and commands, so I think making many distinctions should be fine as long as the most common parts of the syntax have colors that are easy enough to read.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |