[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SMuFL name mapping update
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: SMuFL name mapping update |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:50:42 +0000 (UTC) |
>> Indeed. Care to open an SMuFL issue at their site?
>
> Do you mean we propose that SMuFL *itself* should explicitly
> recommend that programs default to timeSigX when the other number
> sets aren't present?
I think I was slightly confused, trying to apply Unicode principles on
SMuFL. However, the latter is clearly a glyph standard, and not a
character standard, so my thoughts went into the wrong direction.
> I doubt we'd find success there; I only meant it'd be less awful for
> Emmentaler to leave fingeringX and figbassX undefined.
OK.
>> Yes, this should be straightforward and easy to implement. Can you
>> work on that?
>
> Sure. I'll have to review MetaPost again, but I can do it.
Thanks in advance :-)
Werner
Re: SMuFL name mapping update, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/06/14