[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NUMERIC is HASHABLE
|
From: |
Paolo Redælli |
|
Subject: |
NUMERIC is HASHABLE |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:59:32 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 |
Following the inheritance chain of INTEGER_32 I noticed this:
deferred class NUMERIC
--
-- This class describes a ring.
--
inherit
HASHABLE -- *** Here ? Weird ! *** 3th feb 2006 *** Fred + Guillem +
Dom ***
Indeed as far as I can say a ring is not hashable.
Why has it been put there?
Is it a quick'n'dirty solution or does it have a design choice behind it?
- NUMERIC is HASHABLE,
Paolo Redælli <=