[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol"
From: |
csmgroup |
Subject: |
Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol" |
Date: |
5 Dec 2006 22:50:06 -0800 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
It's hard to make the example to regenerate the error.
For the small test, it works well both Linux g++ and Mac OS X g++.
But the real OpenAccess source code which is around 40M of source code
in total.
The Mac OS X g++ code doens't seem like to make the function inlined
whereas Linux g++ always does.
I hope to find a compiler flag which forces the Mac OS X g++ always
generates the inline.
Thanks.
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> csmgroup@gmail.com wrote:
> > The real problem is that even after I declared the class functions as
> > inline, and even after forcing it to alwasy be a inline function, it
> > doesn't look like it becomes a inline function under the Mac OS X.
> >
> > template<class T>
> > inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
> > SPtr<T>::createInstance(const char *classID,
> > IBase *reserved)
> > {
>
> Hmmm, using __attribute((always_inline)) is like shooting with cannons on
> birds, the simple inline should do the job. I just tried something like
> what you did and couldn't reproduce the error. I guess we are not doing
> the same things, so I suggest you boil this down to a testcase. In your
> first posting you had one already, but after fixing the missing inlines,
> it should compile and link, so I wonder what the difference to the real
> program is.
>
> Uli
>
> [another fullquote environmentally friendly discarded]
> --
> http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html
> http://parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
- How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", csmgroup, 2006/12/03
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/12/03
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", csmgroup, 2006/12/04
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", Ulrich Eckhardt, 2006/12/04
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", csmgroup, 2006/12/04
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", Maxim Yegorushkin, 2006/12/05
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", address@hidden, 2006/12/05
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", Ulrich Eckhardt, 2006/12/05
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", Ulrich Eckhardt, 2006/12/05
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol",
csmgroup <=
- Re: How to suppress the "multiple definitions of symbol", Ulrich Eckhardt, 2006/12/07