[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: errno bug?
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: errno bug? |
Date: |
06 Oct 2004 15:12:16 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) |
"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.Robert.Tisdale@jpl.nasa.gov> writes:
> >> extern int errno;
> This has nothing to do with standards.
Oh yes, it does.
The SUSv{1,2} standard used to say that you *may* declare 'extern int errno;'
It doesn't say that anymore.
> The declaration and the macro definition are inconsistent.
It is inconsistent with the declaration of errno in *your* code,
which is illegal and should be removed.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
- Re: errno bug?, (continued)
- Re: errno bug?, Thomas Maeder, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, Maurizio Loreti, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, Thomas Maeder, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, Ross Smith, 2004/10/07
- Re: errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/07
- Re: errno bug?, Ulrich Eckhardt, 2004/10/07
- Re: errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/07
- Re: errno bug?,
Paul Pluzhnikov <=