[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 %
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp) |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2023 23:21:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>>> Is my understanding of the documentation - that native
>>> compilation is an automatic side effect of byte
>>> compiling, wrong?
>>
>> Yes, it's wrong. Native compilation happens automatically
>> when you _load_ a .elc file, not when you compile it.
>
> It doesn't happen when you byte-compile but it also don't
> happen when you load it, or that depends what you mean by
> "load"ing.
Use `native-compile', works for individual Elisp files -
and more.
See an example here:
https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/Makefile
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, (continued)
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Jean Louis, 2023/02/17
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/19
- Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Madhu, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp),
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/23
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Jean Louis, 2023/02/23
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/27
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/22
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Madhu, 2023/02/25
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Stefan Monnier, 2023/02/25
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/26
- FW: [External] : Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Drew Adams, 2023/02/26