[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: operations on path lists
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: operations on path lists |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:55:52 +0000 |
> > To help person how you think is better, then write it in
> > your way for that person.
>
> Nope, we write code for computers, not for people.
I write if for myself, by way of the computer.
> Only comments are written for people - and they should only
> denote stuff that sticks out as weird, thus needs to
> be explained.
I disagree that only comments are written for people.
Code written for easy understanding by people - other
things being equal - is far more useful. (And more
beautiful/elegant.)
Depending on the language, elegant code communicates
better than inelegant code plus comments to lipstick
the pig. In general, the more elegant the language,
the less human-language code (aka comments) is needed
to communicate among us.
- Re: [External] : Re: operations on path lists, (continued)
- Re: operations on path lists, Jean Louis, 2023/02/04
- Re: operations on path lists, Samuel Wales, 2023/02/04
- Re: operations on path lists, Samuel Wales, 2023/02/04
- Re: operations on path lists, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/05
- Re: operations on path lists, Jean Louis, 2023/02/07
- Re: operations on path lists, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/07
- RE: [External] : Re: operations on path lists,
Drew Adams <=
- RE: [External] : Re: operations on path lists, Drew Adams, 2023/02/07
Re: operations on path lists, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/05
Re: operations on path lists, James Thomas, 2023/02/11
Re: operations on path lists, Ruijie Yu, 2023/02/11