Re: Lookarounds and recursion in Emacs regexes

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:53:56 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >> It doesn't prevent adding other extension languages, nor
> >> even does it necessarily prevent changing the
> >> implementation language to another one in theory.
> >
> > Indeed, but replacing ELisp would probably need to rewrite
> > a lot of internals currently implemented in C, since most,
> > if not all, of them are currently very tightly coupled with
> > Lisp and assume the existence and design/implementation of
> > various aspects of the Lisp machine.
> 
> I don't think anyone suggests replacing Elisp

Stefan did, in the part cited above.  he didn't suggest it, but he
said it's not prevented.  And I replied to that part.