Re: Does Richard M. Stallman still scrutinize and develop the codes of Emacs now?

[Arthur Miller]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 13:05:30 -0400
>> From: "Samuel Banya" <sbanya@fastmail.com>
>> 
>> The way I think of this is like this:
>> 
>> There always will be a fork.
>
> I suggest to think again, and this time based on what history teaches
> us.  There _have_ been forks of Emacs, and we already know how they
> ended.
>
> I guess forking Emacs is not the same as forking another project, even
> if it's Vim.

Remacs is officially dead:

"This project isn't maintained anymore."

https://github.com/remacs/remacs

Emacs "Next Generation" is on the way ... :-).