|
From: | Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto |
Subject: | Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required |
Date: | Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:19:05 -0500 |
Dear Luis,
On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 12:23 +0000, Luis Falcon wrote:
Let's not confuse the physical sex with legal or gender. This issue has been brought up several times already, and I will change the term "sex" for "gender" in the person (party) model.
Whatever you do, please don't change sex to gender. They are very different concepts and sex is what we care about in health. [1]
On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 08:55 +0000, Cédric Krier wrote:
The boolean proposal is semantically the same as mine to add a new optionAnd I agree with what Cedric said here.
"Unknown" except that my solution doesn't add an extra field which should be
tested all over the code before using the sex field.
--
Marc
[1] http://www.amamanualofstyle.com/view/10.1093/jama/9780195176339.001.0001/med-9780195176339-div2-350
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |