guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#67118] [PATCH] Change "tabulation" to "tabulation character" in lin


From: Simon Tournier
Subject: [bug#67118] [PATCH] Change "tabulation" to "tabulation character" in linter & manual
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:03:24 +0100

Hi,

On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 at 15:54, Ian Eure <ian@retrospec.tv> wrote:

> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
> index 94903fb5e2..6396f129a1 100644
> --- a/doc/guix.texi
> +++ b/doc/guix.texi
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@
>  Copyright @copyright{} 2023 Zheng Junjie@*
>  Copyright @copyright{} 2023 Brian Cully@*
>  Copyright @copyright{} 2023 Felix Lechner@*
> +Copyright @copyright{} 2023 Ian Eure@*

I am not sure that a oneline change implies a Copyright header. :-)

And other change neither, I guess.
  
> -                  make-flags #:allow-other-keys)
> +                     make-flags #:allow-other-keys)
>               (define make-flags/sexp
>                 (if (gexp? make-flags/sexp)
>                     (gexp->approximate-sexp make-flags)
>                     make-flags))
> -          ;; Some packages like 'tzdata' are never cross-compiled;
> -          ;; the compilers are only used to build tools for
> -          ;; compiling the rest of the package.
> -          (if (eq? target '#false)
> -              '()
> -              (find-incorrect-compilers make-flags/sexp)))
> +             ;; Some packages like 'tzdata' are never cross-compiled;
> +             ;; the compilers are only used to build tools for
> +             ;; compiling the rest of the package.
> +             (if (eq? target '#false)
> +                 '()
> +                 (find-incorrect-compilers make-flags/sexp)))
>             (package-arguments package))))

There is no change here, right?

> diff --git a/tests/lint.scm b/tests/lint.scm
> index a52a82237b..cec9e3ab21 100644
> --- a/tests/lint.scm
> +++ b/tests/lint.scm
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  ;;; Copyright © 2020 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
>  ;;; Copyright © 2021 Xinglu Chen <public@yoctocell.xyz>
>  ;;; Copyright © 2021, 2023 Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
> +;;; Copyright © 2023 Ian Eure <ian@retrospec.tv>
>  ;;;
>  ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
>  ;;;
> @@ -359,18 +360,18 @@ (define (warning-contains? str warnings)
>    '()
>    (check-compiler-for-target
>     (dummy-package "x"
> -               (arguments
> -                (list #:make-flags
> -                      #~(list (string-append "CC=" (cc-for-target))))))))
> +                  (arguments
> +                   (list #:make-flags
> +                         #~(list (string-append "CC=" (cc-for-target))))))))

No change here, right?

>  (test-equal "compiler-for-target: CC=gcc is acceptable when target=#false"
>    '()
>    (check-compiler-for-target
>     ;; This (dummy) package consists purely of architecture-independent data.
>     (dummy-package "tzdata"
> -               (arguments
> -                (list #:target #false
> -                      #:make-flags #~(list "CC=gcc"))))))
> +                  (arguments
> +                   (list #:target #false
> +                         #:make-flags #~(list "CC=gcc"))))))

No change?

>  ;; The emacs-build-system sets #:tests? #f by default.
>  (test-equal "tests-true: #:tests? #t acceptable for emacs packages"
> @@ -1307,16 +1308,16 @@ (define (package-with-phase-changes changes)
>  
>  (test-assert "formatting: tabulation"
>    (string-match-or-error
> -   "tabulation on line [0-9]+, column [0-9]+"
> +   "tabulation character \\(0x09\\) on line [0-9]+, column [0-9]+"
>     (single-lint-warning-message
> -    (check-formatting (dummy-package "leave the tab here:    ")))))
> +    (check-formatting (dummy-package "leave the tab here:       ")))))
>  
>  (test-assert "formatting: trailing white space"
>    (string-match-or-error
>     "trailing white space .*"
>     ;; Leave the trailing white space on the next line!
>     (single-lint-warning-message
> -    (check-formatting (dummy-package "x")))))            
> +    (check-formatting (dummy-package "x")))))

What is the change here?


Cheers,
simon





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]