[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i686 core-updates failure.
From: |
Felix Lechner |
Subject: |
Re: i686 core-updates failure. |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:30:42 -0700 |
Hi everyone,
> At some point we have to make choices
>
> Guix has never achieved usability as a desktop system on non-Intel
> systems.
>
> I've come to believe that having Guix work well on non-Intel systems
> is,
> in practice, incompatible with the rate at which we update our
> packages.
There are many good reasons to drop a machine type but I'm not sure
that's one. In my book, a poorly working Guix system is still better
than having none at all.
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
P.S. Porting to exotic architectures can also expose interesting bugs
that make software more portable in the future.
Re: i686 core-updates failure., Simon Tournier, 2023/04/13
Re: i686 core-updates failure., jgart, 2023/04/13
Re: i686 core-updates failure., Simon Tournier, 2023/04/13
Re: i686 core-updates failure., Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/04/13
- Re: i686 core-updates failure., Greg Hogan, 2023/04/13
- Re: i686 core-updates failure., Simon Tournier, 2023/04/13
- Re: i686 core-updates failure., Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/04/13
- Re: i686 core-updates failure., Lars-Dominik Braun, 2023/04/13
- Re: i686 core-updates failure., Simon Tournier, 2023/04/13
- Re: i686 core-updates failure., Andreas Enge, 2023/04/13
- Re: i686 core-updates failure., Simon Tournier, 2023/04/13