[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time travel accident
From: |
Konrad Hinsen |
Subject: |
Re: Time travel accident |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:53:51 +0200 |
Hi Simon,
> I get the same thing without doing anything special.
Interesting. Before my clock-changing experiment, the same command line
got me much further: the old Guix started to work and only failed when
building OpenSSL.
> Well, v1.0 appears to me as the zero for time-travel – soft limit. And
> the introduction of inferiors is the hard limit, so I guess you are
> hitting that limit, no?
Another good question. I have hit it often enough in the past, but the
error message I got looked different. But then, I guess the error
message for illicit time travel is not part of the documented behavior
of Guix.
Cheers,
Konrad.
- Time travel accident, Konrad Hinsen, 2023/04/07
- Re: Time travel accident, Josselin Poiret, 2023/04/07
- Re: Time travel accident, Julien Lepiller, 2023/04/07
- Re: Time travel accident, Konrad Hinsen, 2023/04/07
- Re: Time travel accident, Julien Lepiller, 2023/04/07
- Re: Time travel accident, Konrad Hinsen, 2023/04/11
- Re: Time travel accident, Konrad Hinsen, 2023/04/12
- Re: Time travel accident, Simon Tournier, 2023/04/12
- Re: Time travel accident, Konrad Hinsen, 2023/04/13
- Re: Time travel accident, Simon Tournier, 2023/04/12
- Re: Time travel accident,
Konrad Hinsen <=
Re: Time travel accident, Simon Tournier, 2023/04/07
Re: Time travel accident, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/04/17