[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python
From: |
Lars-Dominik Braun |
Subject: |
Re: Python |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:56:59 +0100 |
Hi,
> Right now I am left with a number of test failures that look real and cannot
> easily be solved by an upgrade (either because we are already on the latest
> version or because the tests still fail): python-sgmllib3k, python-typeguard
> and python-coveralls. See messages below.
I don’t know for sure why any of these packages’ tests fail. typeguard
looks like it expects specific strings from Python or one of its libraries
– safe to ignore. sgmllib3k looks pretty dead upstream. Perhaps it’s
not even needed any more? Updates to Python packages (via `guix refresh`)
do not update dependencies and thus the list of inputs/native-inputs
are most likely outdated.
Well, there are reasons no-one is updating the Python ecosystem
regularly…
Cheers,
Lars
- Re: Python, (continued)
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/19
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/21
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/22
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/23
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/24
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/24
- Re: Python, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2023/02/24
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/25
- Re: Python, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2023/02/25
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/25
- Re: Python,
Lars-Dominik Braun <=
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/25
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/25
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/25
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/25
- Re: Python, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2023/02/27
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/28
- Re: Python, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/25
- Re: Python, Efraim Flashner, 2023/02/27
- Re: Python, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2023/02/27
- Re: Python (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/21