[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging core-updates?
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Merging core-updates? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:03:38 +0100 |
Am Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:41:08PM +0100 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> You didn't write the hash. As the hash is unknown, it would be
> irreproducible for the Guix daemon to grant the build process access to the
> network, so the Guix daemon doesn't.
> You'll need to enter a hash (possibly a bogus one that the daemon can
> complain about later).
Interesting, thanks for the explanation!
Andreas
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), (continued)
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/17
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/17
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/17
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Kaelyn, 2023/02/17
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/18
- Re: Merging core-updates?, Maxime Devos, 2023/02/16
- Re: Merging core-updates?,
Andreas Enge <=
Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/18
- Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/18
- Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?), Julien Lepiller, 2023/02/19
- Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?), Simon Tournier, 2023/02/20
- Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?), Julien Lepiller, 2023/02/20
- Re: Ocaml, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/20
Python (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/19