[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Time for RFC? (was Re: Moving forward with teams and feature branches (w
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Time for RFC? (was Re: Moving forward with teams and feature branches (was: Discussion notes on releases and branches)) |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 10:32:32 +0100 |
Hi,
On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 22:13, Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> wrote:
> 1. Document this workflow in the manual, in a dedicated node, with a
> rationale as well. One thing worth mentioning would be how to handle
> grafting/ungrafting now. Also remove the staging/core-updates
> criterion.
Maybe it is also time for “RFC” as discussed earlier. It would fit this
item #1.
Time for a request-for-comments process?
id:87cznqb1sl.fsf@inria.fr
Wed, 27 Oct 2021 23:22:50 +0200
https://yhetil.org/guix/87cznqb1sl.fsf@inria.fr
Some examples of other projects.
https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs
https://peps.python.org/pep-0000/
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs
Cheers,
simon