|
From: | Oliver Corff |
Subject: | Re: Definitely positive font installation experience, but not without caveats |
Date: | Fri, 21 Apr 2023 17:47:15 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 |
Hi Deri, in-croy-able! I should have thought of ps2pdf, but somehow I didn't see the wood due to the trees. Running ps2pdf on the 25 MB monster produced a palatable 28408 bytes of pdf, and everything appears as it should. I received the warning "Can't embed the complete font DFSongStd as it is too large, embedding a subset." but I still have to find out whether real-world documents in CJK are a challenge, or not. Best regards, Oliver. On 21/04/2023 17:41, Deri wrote:
On Friday, 21 April 2023 15:44:17 BST Oliver Corff wrote:I noticed a bit of latency while compiling *and* while displaying the result --- so very untypical of groff. When I wanted to attach the pdf result, I understood, why. The pdf file is a whopping 25745276 bytes big. The resulting pdf file contains one huge "stream" object approx. 100,000 lines long. I think this is the CJK glyph data. Does groff have any concept of storing only those glyph shapes in the target file which are really required by the document? Thank you, Best regards, Oliver.Hi Oliver, This is called "font subsetting". Gropdf does not do that at the moment so the size can be substantially reduced by running the pdf through ghostscript's ps2pdf, if the pdf contains large embedded fonts. I say "at the moment", watch this space, but it won't be in the upcoming 1.23.0. Cheers Deri
-- Dr. Oliver Corff Wittelsbacherstr. 5A 10707 Berlin G E R M A N Y Tel.: +49-30-85727260 Mail: oliver.corff@email.de
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |