[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Formatting difference with 1.23.0.rc3 (ms)
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: Formatting difference with 1.23.0.rc3 (ms) |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Apr 2023 14:11:17 -0500 |
At 2023-04-08T19:38:49-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Yes. Technically, this changed behavior is the result of a bug fix to
> bring our rendering of ms documents more in line with AT&T troff ms, and
> we don't ordinarily document bug fixes in the NEWS file.
>
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62688
>
> But since you're the second person to have raised this issue to the
> mailing list, it seems it might be worth adding a NEWS item about it.
> So I'll see about that.
Here is my proposed text.
+o The s (ms) macro package now enables the formatter's "no-space mode"
+ after ending displays (`DE`) and equations (`EQ`); this is to improve
+ the fidelity of rendering of historical ms(7) documents such as
+ Kernighan & Cherry's "Typesetting Mathematics". This change means
+ that display distance spacing (the `DD` register) overrides paragraph
+ spacing (the `PD` register) instead of accumulating with it.
Any suggestions?
Also, I'll note that stacking up `LP` and/or `PP` in immediate sequence
does in fact still work to increase inter-paragraph distance, as long as
a display is not adjacent, but I am dubious of the technique. See
attachment. If you want to precisely measure the amount of space
between paragraphs, the `PD` register is the way to achieve it.
Regards,
Branden
stacking-paragraph-macros.ms
Description: Troff MS-macros document
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature