[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "absolute" vertical position seems awfully relative
From: |
Peter Schaffter |
Subject: |
Re: "absolute" vertical position seems awfully relative |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jun 2021 01:26:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021, Dave Kemper wrote:
> But specify a macro package of -ms, -me, or -mm on the command line,
> and the results change: the text is now in noticeably different
> positions on the two pages. The placement with all three macro
> packages is remarkably similar.
>
> Why should a macro package change groff's concept of an absolute
> distance from the top of a page?
The mom macros don't exhibit the behaviour. I wouldn't have thought
it possible. The question isn't why should it, but how could it?
The only thing I can think of is that the .bp is triggering a macro
that changes the .vs. That could result in different vertical
placements, but not, I think, "noticeable."
--
Peter Schaffter
https://www.schaffter.ca