[groff] 01/34: ChangeLog: Fix grammar and style nits.

[G. Branden Robinson]

gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.

commit f646d9be7659eeaeadd46c698e020b758add37e3
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sat Oct 16 14:49:00 2021 +1100

    ChangeLog: Fix grammar and style nits.
    
    * Correct format of an entry.
    * Fix doubled word and subject/verb agreement.
---
 ChangeLog | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index a5dbabf..89cabb6 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
        (tty_printer::simple_add_char): Add stripped-down alternative to
        `add_char()` member function for cases where we want to use many
        defaults because we're writing a terminal escape sequence, not
-       rendering a glyph.  (A function like `add_char()` that take 8
+       rendering a glyph.  (A function like `add_char()` that takes 8
        arguments of varying types is a code smell--phew!)
        (tty_printer::special): Call `special_link()` member function if
        the device control command is `link`.
@@ -581,8 +581,7 @@
        * src/include/font.h (font::load_font): Drop second parameter.
        It was never used for its intended purpose.
        (load): Drop first parameter; likewise.
-       * src/libs/libgroff/font.cpp (font::load)
-       (load): As above.
+       * src/libs/libgroff/font.cpp (font::load, load): As above.
 
        * src/libs/libgroff/font.cpp (struct text_file): Rename
        `skip_comments` to `recognize_comments`.  Demote that and
@@ -870,10 +869,10 @@
 
        * src/libs/libbib/index.cpp
        (index_search_item::get_invalidity_reason): Don't complain about
-       about a last list element being nonnegative if the list size was
-       zero in the first place, as can happen with an empty index.
-       More seriously from a language standpoint, avoid reading through 
-       a negative array index (this can escape a compiler's attention
+       a last list element being nonnegative if the list size was zero
+       in the first place, as can happen with an empty index.  More
+       seriously from a language standpoint, avoid reading through a
+       negative array index (this can escape a compiler's attention
        because we're reading from the midst of a heap-allocated or
        `mmap()`ed region, but it's still a code smell).