gnunet-svn
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[taler-docs] branch master updated: first comments


From: gnunet
Subject: [taler-docs] branch master updated: first comments
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:17:10 +0100

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

grothoff pushed a commit to branch master
in repository docs.

The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new e26178d  first comments
e26178d is described below

commit e26178d09d1cea5a56530b3d2033aaeeadc593c3
Author: Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>
AuthorDate: Fri Feb 17 15:17:07 2023 +0100

    first comments
---
 design-documents/037-wallet-transactions-lifecycle.rst | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/design-documents/037-wallet-transactions-lifecycle.rst 
b/design-documents/037-wallet-transactions-lifecycle.rst
index d383f56..5280342 100644
--- a/design-documents/037-wallet-transactions-lifecycle.rst
+++ b/design-documents/037-wallet-transactions-lifecycle.rst
@@ -474,6 +474,8 @@ TODO: Also specify variant where account reserve needs to 
be created / funded fi
 
   * ``[action:abort] => aborted``: At this stage, it's safe to just abort.
 
+    CG: is this not 'suspend' (safe to resume!). Also, deletion transitions 
are missing.
+
 * ``pending(wait-deposit)``
 
   We're waiting for the other party to pay into the pre-merged purse.
@@ -518,7 +520,7 @@ Transaction Type: Peer Pull Debit
   * ``[processed-success] => done``
   * ``[action:abort] => aborting(refresh)``: Wallet tries to refresh coins
     that were not already deposited. XXX Do we really always refresh even if 
no deposit
-    attempt has been made yet?
+    attempt has been made yet? CG: only every refresh those coins that are 
dirty.
 
 * ``aborting(refresh)``
 

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
gnunet@gnunet.org.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]