gnuastro-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnuastro-commits] master f3aa44f: Correction in Sience and its tools se


From: Mohammad Akhlaghi
Subject: [gnuastro-commits] master f3aa44f: Correction in Sience and its tools section of book
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 06:58:39 -0500 (EST)

branch: master
commit f3aa44f9c27f551acbe0ca5d0e5035135c2e1b25
Author: Mohammad Akhlaghi <address@hidden>
Commit: Mohammad Akhlaghi <address@hidden>

    Correction in Sience and its tools section of book
    
    A minor (one word) correction was made to the ending of the "Science and
    its tools" section of the book: "known" was changed to "existing". This was
    because "known" could be interpretted as "true": implying "know"ing
    something that is "absolutely true". This is contrary to the spirit of this
    section, or science as defined by Popper or Kuhn, were the assumption of an
    "absolute truth" is not necessary. "existing" was a good alternative to fix
    this issue and does not cause the confusion above.
---
 doc/gnuastro.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/gnuastro.texi b/doc/gnuastro.texi
index dacc848..5993c2b 100644
--- a/doc/gnuastro.texi
+++ b/doc/gnuastro.texi
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ looked for in the sixth place of decimals.
 If scientists are considered to be more than mere ``puzzle
 solvers''@footnote{Thomas S. Kuhn. @emph{The Structure of Scientific
 Revolutions}, University of Chicago Press, 1962.} (simply adding to
-the decimals of known values or observing a feature in 10, 100, or
+the decimals of existing values or observing a feature in 10, 100, or
 100000 more galaxies or stars, as Kelvin and Michelson clearly
 believed), they cannot just passively sit back and uncritically repeat
 the previous (observational or theoretical) methods/tools on new



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]