|
From: | RJack |
Subject: | Re: GPL misappropriation |
Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 16:09:53 -0000 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
Peter Köhlmann wrote:
Hadron wrote:David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:Hyman Rosen wrote:On 3/22/2010 3:41 PM, RJack wrote:That will never happen. Copyrights are exclusive rights and cannot be licensed by anyone except the *owner* of a copyright. Releasing BSD licensed code under the GPL is simply attempting to steal it.BSD-licensed code gives others the right to create derivative works without requiring that those derivative works be licensed under the same terms.Meaning that material originally licensed under the BSDL must remain licensed under the BSDL (with just a few restrictions imposed on binary-only form) and not hijacked by the GPL retards, you moron Hyman.Seems like you don't understand the difference between copyleft and weak permissive licenses.Wasn't it you who claimed all this was really easy to understand? And yet months later you're still here fighting bitterly ....Fighting bitterly? Really? Against the likes of Alexander there simply is no "fight" Cretins like him would not understand something as simple as "1+1 = 2" Do you actually claim that bullshitters like Alexander or "RJack" have anything of value to add? Do you actually claim that those cretins are not oxygen thieves?
Who pissed in your Cheerios today? Alexander of RJack? Sincerely, RJack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |