Re: GPL misappropriation

[Moshe]

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:22:52 -0500, RJack wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>> 
>>> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/22/2010 3:41 PM, RJack wrote:
>>>>>>> That will never happen. Copyrights are exclusive rights and
>>>>>>> cannot be licensed by anyone except the *owner* of a
>>>>>>> copyright. Releasing BSD licensed code under the GPL is
>>>>>>> simply attempting to steal it.
>>>>>> BSD-licensed code gives others the right to create derivative
>>>>>>  works without requiring that those derivative works be
>>>>>> licensed under the same terms.
>>>>> Meaning that material originally licensed under the BSDL must
>>>>> remain licensed under the BSDL (with just a few restrictions
>>>>> imposed on binary-only form) and not hijacked by the GPL
>>>>> retards, you moron Hyman.
>>>> Seems like you don't understand the difference between copyleft
>>>> and weak permissive licenses.
>>>> 
>>> Wasn't it you who claimed all this was really easy to understand?
>>> And yet months later you're still here fighting bitterly ....
>> 
>> Fighting bitterly? Really?
>> 
>> Against the likes of Alexander there simply is no "fight"
>> 
>> Cretins like him would not understand something as simple as "1+1 =
>> 2"
>> 
>> Do you actually claim that bullshitters like Alexander or "RJack"
>> have anything of value to add? Do you actually claim that those
>> cretins are not oxygen thieves?
> 
> Who pissed in your Cheerios today? Alexander of RJack?
> 
> Sincerely,
> RJack :)

You might want to ask Peter Kohlmann how the music program Finale
is *not* used for music composition.

After he dodges that one, you can ask him about anti-aliasing,
fonts and screen shots.
He has some great theories on that one.

IOW the guy has no clue what he is talking about.