Re: SFLC is SOL

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 3/16/2010 2:43 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > The "unadorned" copyright doesn't not put restrictions on terms and
> > conditions of licensing of the new copyright in a derivative work (which
> > is exclusive rights and which belongs to the author of derivative work)
> > "to all third parties" thereby creating a right against the world
> > governed under state law of contract akin to the GPL.
> 
> "Doesn't not"?

The "unadorned" copyright doesn't, (does) not put restrictions on terms
and conditions of licensing of the new copyright in a derivative work
(which is exclusive right and which belongs to the author of derivative
work) "to all third parties" thereby creating a right against the world
governed under state law of contract akin to the GPL. 

> Anyway, you fail to understand copyright law, as usual. A

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091020161950.htm

Hth, Hyman.

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)