[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC is SOL
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC is SOL |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:07:27 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> > This means that the SFLC cannot file a vouluntary dismissal without
>> > the permission of Best Buy Inc.
>>
>> There is no such thing as "filing an unvoluntary dismissal".
>
> Uh retard dak.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_dismissal
>
> "Involuntary dismissal is the termination of a court case despite the
> plaintiff's objection.
And just how (and why) would a plaintiff actually _file_ an involuntary
dismissal? I never said there _was_ no such thing as an involuntary
dismissal, but it certainly can't be _filed_ by a party.
--
David Kastrup
- SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04