Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

[Hyman Rosen]

On 2/4/2010 12:16 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Are you seriously suggestion that offering the GPL'd binaries for
> downloading
> http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
> without even slight mentioning of the GPL and NOT providing access to
> the source code from the same place is okay provided one puts some hints
> where to locate the source code (from third party) in its support
> database?

What is "the same place" when it comes to a website?
And that firmware is being distributed as upgrades to a router;
the customer purchasing that router will already have received
this Verizon-branded manual
<http://support.actiontec.com/doc_files/MI424WR_Rev._E_User_Manual_20.8.0_v3_GPL.pdf>
and an accompanying disk containing full GPL information.

Your attempts to be "holier than the FSF" to demonstrate
non-compliance with the GPL when there is actually clear
compliance are quite pathetic.