Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Hyman Rosen]

amicus_curious wrote:
> Actiontec was not an agent of Verizon.  Verizon did not make the GPL for 
> Actiontec devices available.  Ergo your statement is false.

Verizon gets its routers from Actiontec. It makes firmware upgrades
available through a URL containing "actiontec gateway". It's not at
all clear that Verizon is involved in activities which bring it under
the purview of the GPL. Ergo my statement has a good chance of being
true.