Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Rjack]

Rahul Dhesi wrote:
> Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>
> [ still arguing promissory estoppel ]
>
> > > How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise?
>
> > "2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any 
> > portion of it...
>
> Permission alone is not a promise.  What is the writer of the GPL
>  promising to do or not to do?

You're lettin' your ignorance hang out in public Rahul -- that's
unbecoming for a genius like you.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)