[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:35:55 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:52:22 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
>> You're begging the question. Your "conclusion" is that the source need
>> only be available if it's been modified, and, since the source wasn't
>> modified, then it need not be available.
>>
> I am not arguing the meaning of the text contained in the GPL, I am
> saying that, unless the code has been modified in some useful way, then
> it is of no value to the community.
So you don't dispute the legality of the GPL? You're just find it
inconvenient? If so, then don't distribute GPL'd software and go about
your business.
-Thufir
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/24
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/24
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Thufir Hawat, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Message not available
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Message not available
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/24
- Message not available
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Miles Bader, 2009/02/23
- Message not available
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23