[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:31:23 +0100 |
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
[... 17 USC 109 ...]
> An interesting argument that has been made before in these newsgroups.
> But not one that anybody ever pleaded as a defense in an actual lawsuit
> so far as I can tell.
http://www.terekhov.de/14.pdf
------
SIXTH DEFENSE
(FIRST SALE DOCTRINE)
Plaintiffs claims are barred by the first sale doctrine.
------
SFLC voluntarily dismissed the case shortly after Bell Microproducts
filed the answer to the complaint.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", none of your buisiness, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05