|
| From: | Rahul Dhesi |
| Subject: | Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Dec 2008 21:16:09 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-agent: | nn/6.7.0 |
>Rjack writes: >>Aren't you a being a little presumptuous when you simply ignore the >>doctrine of promissory estoppel when considering a failed license? >What's the promise here? Did Rjack ever post an answer to this question? -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |