[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:07:59 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
> Rjack wrote:
>> the GPL is preempted under 17 USC 301
>
> Ah, if only the courts in the real world ruled the
> same way the courts in your head do, how happy you
> would be!
Why? Then the software would not be redistributable, so what point would
that serve even to him?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2008/12/01
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/09