[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: GPL 2(b) HUH? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:32:42 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>Let the group's readers decide this matter for themselves based
>upon what you and I have respectively posted.
Now, of course, they can do so, since I went to the trouble of
identifying the essential missing context and pointing it out. If you
had properly preserved the context, this would not have been necessary.
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, (continued)
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/19
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/19
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/19
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/21
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rjack, 2008/09/19
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rjack, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rjack, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?,
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rjack, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/18
Message not available