[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:22:38 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> writes:
>BusyBox, however, appears to be a US non-registered work, not a non-us
>non-registered work.
To whom does it appear this way? Not to any of the defendants so far.
>Thus, we'd expect that even if someone were suing over a non-US work,
>they would register before filing suit, to take advantage of the extra
>remedies.
These extra remedies being what -- statutory damages?
Damages are probably not so important to the Busybox developers. The big
stick they carry, which became bigger after the JMRI decision, is the
threat of an injunction.
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, (continued)
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rjack, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, chrisv, 2008/09/13
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Tim Smith, 2008/09/13
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Tim Smith, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Tim Smith, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Ben Pfaff, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Tim Smith, 2008/09/15
Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/13
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rjack, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/13
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rjack, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/13