[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Noah Slater |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 20:55:12 +0000 |
> Why not call it an "Aston Martin DB9/Ford VH", then? <giggle>
Because the brand name will do, just like "Ubuntu" by it's self.
> It seems then there is an alternative (or not?) viewpoint here
Not really, RMS doesn't claim it is for "getting credit" so I think
you may be confused a little.
> So then why insist that the name used commonly _should_ be
> GNU/Linux?
One can but hope. :)
> What about GNU/BSD where you run the GNU stuff with a
> BSD kernel?
That would work.
> Also, what's the rub on "GNU/Hurd" when the Hurd kernel *is* GNU?
> It should just be "GNU"!
Yes, "GNU" would do just fine in that situation.
> So then why not call the MacOS X a Darwin/XNU, then?
You could. OS X is it's brand name, like "Ubuntu"
> Is it also possible to make a Darwin/GNU system?
Possibly, but I think you mean GNU/XNU. :)
--
Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/12/05
Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/06
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/06
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/06