[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: Monsoon settles: complies with GPL, pays undisclosed sum |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:09:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:47:44PM -0400, rjack wrote:
> Geza Giedke wrote:
>> The case of GPL-violation by Monsoon Multimedia that was discussed
>> here recently has been settled out of court.
>
> "The SFLC is using threats of copyright infringement prosecution under
> the GPL as a tactical matter to force Monsoon Multimedia to comply with
> a contractual covenant.The SFLC will never allow a federal court to
> examine the GPL on its merits.
>
> If the suit goes forward (which I seriously doubt) the District Court
> will dismiss due to failure to state a federal claim. Contract claims
> are heard under the common law of state jurisdictions."
>
>
> The GPL is D.O.A. under a F.R.Civ.P. Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss in a US
> federal court. After the plaintiff's filed a voluntary Motion to Dismiss it
> was inevitable that GPL supporters would trumpet "the GPL won in court".
> Magnanimous claims without the GPL so much as being read by a judge -- same
> old, tired FSF FUD story -- just a different day.
> :)
Yeah, but it seems all lawyers, even experienced ones, seem to cave in
rather than following your expectations, which have had an yet unbeatable
success rate of 0%.
Keep on with the good job, rjack/therekov...
Rui
--
Or is it?
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 12nd day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?