[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:44:05 +0200 |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:29:40PM +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > ROFL. Hey dak, you know that your theory of user linking (when
> > there is no "library with compatible interface") creating "acting as
> > your agent" liability is utter nonsense and only totally lobotomized
> > GNUtians take it seriously, don't you? Just curious.
>
> Hey Alex,
>
> Why don't you get a Shared Source license and test your theories and
> then mail Stevie Balmer?
What exactly do you want me to test and then mail Stevie Balmer,
dear mini-RMS?
regards,
alexander.
--
"The revolution might take significantly longer than anticipated."
-- The GNU Monk Harald Welte
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, Miles Bader, 2007/10/23
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/24
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/10/25
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/23
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/10/23
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/23
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/24
- Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/10/24
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/10/24
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/24
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, danw6144, 2007/10/25