[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix".
From: |
mike3 |
Subject: |
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix". |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:37:26 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Oct 12, 4:43 pm, John Hasler <j...@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
> mike3 writes:
> > What is "Unix" defined as, then? Obviously "UNIX(tm)" is defined as
> > whatever The Open Group has allowed to be branded as such, but what is
> > "Unix" defined as?
>
> You can sell it as Unix if you have permission from The Open Group.
That's what I meant.
> You can call it Unix if you feel moved to do so. Personally, I call it Unix
> if it looks like Unix to me. This means Linux, the BSDs, Solaris, and the
> branded Unixes such as HPUX.
But what to you makes a system "look like Unix", anyway?
> --
> John Hasler
> j...@dhh.gt.org
> Dancing Horse Hill
> Elmwood, WI USA
- Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/10
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Hasler, 2007/10/10
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/11
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Paul Wallington, 2007/10/12
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Christopher Browne, 2007/10/14
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/16
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Christopher Browne, 2007/10/16
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/17
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Hasler, 2007/10/17
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Stephane CHAZELAS, 2007/10/18
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/17
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Tim Smith, 2007/10/17