[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC chooses wrong court
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC chooses wrong court |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:34:50 +0200 |
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
>
> rjack <rjack@com> writes:
>
> >1.) There is no "automatic" contract rescission under New York State
> >common law...
>
> How do you rescind a contract if none ever formed?
Go ask SFLC. Under their theory the license contract is rescind
"automatically".
>From the complaint:
"under the License, any party that redistributes BusyBox in a manner
that does not comply with the terms of the License immediately and
automatically loses all rights granted under it."
regards,
alexander.
--
"The revolution might take significantly longer than anticipated."
-- The GNU Monk Harald Welte
- SFLC chooses wrong court, rjack, 2007/09/23
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Rahul Dhesi, 2007/09/23
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/09/23
- Message not available
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, John Hasler, 2007/09/23
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/09/24
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/09/24
- Message not available
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/09/25
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/09/25
- Message not available
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/09/25
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/09/25
- Message not available
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, rjack, 2007/09/26
- Re: SFLC chooses wrong court, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/09/26