[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source - Free software
From: |
Al Klein |
Subject: |
Re: Open source - Free software |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:24:03 -0400 |
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:34:20 +0200, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:51:06 +0200, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>>> And, in the English-speaking world, "free" is almost always (let's
>>>> say by millions to one, at least) used, when used with a product, to
>>>> mean "with no charge". *VERY FEW* people use free as in freedom
>>>> when using it to modify the name of a product or product type.
>>>
>>>When we are talking about the sort of medium in which expressions are
>>>subject to copyright?
>>
>> No, when we're using the term free software or the word freeware.
>
>Software is a medium in which expressions are subject to copyright.
If I choose to release software I've written without copyright, that's
my choice and my right.
>Welcome to the 21st century.
Welcome to reality.
>>>Free speech, free press, free software, patent free, free arts?
>> Free gas, free milk, free beer?
>Those happen not to be subject to copyright.
Or the flu, but so what? If I release a program, with no price, but
without source and with restrictions on redistribution, modification,
etc., it's still free.
>> The press, patents and the arts aren't items that get sold -
>> software, gas, milk and beer are.
>Software is not sold.
Software CAN BE SOLD - if I write it I can sell it. (And do, all the
time.)
>>Think of the children's learning game, "which of these doesn't
>>belong?" Software doesn't belong with the press, patents and the
>>arts.
>I am afraid that you need to get out of the stone age at some point of
>time.
I did. A long time ago. I didn't get into this business yesterday.
Or this century. Or last decade. Or ... (Stop me when I pass the
day you were born.)
>The very _definition_ of software is that it is, in contrast to
>hardware, intangible. Unlike gas, milk and beer.
But just like the written word - which can be free (without cost) and
it can be sold.
--
It's back - http://www.webdingers.com/filelist.html
- Re: Open source - Free software, (continued)
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/30
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/30
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/30
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/30
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/30
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/30
- Re: Open source - Free software, Roger Johansson, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software,
Al Klein <=
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, spike1, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Roger Johansson, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28