[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source - Free software
From: |
Al Klein |
Subject: |
Re: Open source - Free software |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:50:02 -0400 |
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:29:57 -0400, Barry Margolin
<barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>And if I were talking to lay people, I probably wouldn't use uncommon
>industry jargon. But this is a technical newsgroup
Check your newsreader - you're posting to one technical group that has
a written definition that contradicts your claims.
>we should be able to talk in technospeak and not feel the need to define
>our terms every time.
So you'll be using the acf definitions from now on. Is that what
you're saying?
--
It's back - http://www.webdingers.com/filelist.html
- Re: Open source - Free software, (continued)
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Chris, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Jim, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software,
Al Klein <=
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Jay Belanger, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Immortalist, 2006/09/27
Re: Open source - Free software, Robert Hull, 2006/09/27