[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source - Free software
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Open source - Free software |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:23:10 +0200 (CEST) |
> Not all free software is commercial.
>
> All free software must be commercial, anyone can charge a fee for
> the act of distributing it.
I recommend you look up the difference between "must" and "can" in
a dictionary of your choice.
And I suggest you look up the definition of free software, if you
cannot charge a fee for something, then it is not free software.
Thus, it must be commercial, since you can always charge a fee if you
so choose to.
Please, go hack.
- Re: Open source - Free software, (continued)
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, John Hasler, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28