[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source - Free software
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Open source - Free software |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:06:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> Anyway, I agree with you that Alfred is in an untenable position
> here.
>
> Freeware is software which is non-free that you can distribute at no
> cost.
Says who?
> Free software can thus not be freeware. There is nothing untenable
> about it.
If you come up with a reputable source for the definition of
"freeware" you pulled out of your hat, that is.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Open source - Free software, (continued)
- Re: Open source - Free software, Roger Hunt, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/27
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, John Hasler, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28