[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source - Free software
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Open source - Free software |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:20:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> writes:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:18:02 -0400, Barry Margolin
> <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>>While it may be a shame, they've been using the phrase for about 20
>>years now. It's become part of the industry lexicon. Similarly, we
>>have the jargon "freeware" that refers to software distributed at no
>>cost. So there shouldn't be much ambiguity when the context is
>>understood
>
> Since most people who use software aren't part of "the industry", and
> understand "free" to mean "without charge",
Whatever happened to the land of the brave and the free?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Open source - Free software, (continued)
- Re: Open source - Free software, Chris, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Jim, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Open source - Free software, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Jay Belanger, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Immortalist, 2006/09/27
Re: Open source - Free software, Robert Hull, 2006/09/27