[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source - Free software
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Open source - Free software |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:42:42 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:27:34 -0400, Barry Margolin
<barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>Whether they should be able to is of purely academic interest. The fact
>is that they *did* do this, and this is what the phrase "free software"
>now means in the industry. You can dislike it all you want, but you
>can't legitimately claim that it didn't happen, and ignoring it will
>simply lead to confusion in discussions like this.
So will ignoring the fact that "free <any product in commerce>" means
without charge.
This is simply false, free has a special meaning. You probobly
confuse the word free with the word gratis. Gratis is a much clearer
word, maybe you could use that instead of causing confusions like
these?
- Re: Open source - Free software, (continued)
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Open source - Free software, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Al Klein, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2006/09/29
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/27