[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source - Free software
From: |
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz |
Subject: |
Re: Open source - Free software |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:01:57 -0300 |
begin In <451A32C7.C1661E53@web.de>, on 09/27/2006
at 10:13 AM, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> said:
>Except that copylefted "free software" is based on viral price-fixing
> restriction regarding the price of derivative intellectual property
So? Nobody forces me to use it, and no court has convicted the authors
of conduct in restraint of trade.
>This obligation of viral contracting and price-fixing (licensing of
>derivative works) is blatant violation of EU Art 81.
So you say. I don't buy it, and I don't live in the EU.
>It appears that even the GPL-moronized court in Frankfurt was able
>to recognize the problem to some extent. The court labeled the
>obligations part of the GPL Section 2 as "möglicherweise nichtige
>Teil" (i.e. possibly void and unenforceable part):
Possibly? That doesn't sound like anything to rest a case on. And the
judge doesn't have to run faster than the bear, he just has to run
faster than you.
>But according to the GPL-moronized court in Frankfurt, eventhough
>the obligations part of GPL Section 2 is (straight from the
>district court's mouth -- see Pg. 14 in judgment) "möglicherweise
>nichtige Teil" (i.e. possibly void and unenforceable part) due to
>illegal price-fixing and viral contracting in violation of EU Art
>81, the defendant must be guilty of "copyright infringement" for
>not complying with it nevertheless.
No, tonto, that's not an accurate description. The defendant must be
guilty of copyright infringement because he copied the code and had no
authorization to do so. That should be simple enough even for you.
>Oh, Ah, BTW, SCO did really nice job trashing GPL "enforcement"
>theory in 794 memorandum:
Yeah, right, SCO is making great progress in its vexatious litigation.
*PLONK*
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Re: Open source - Free software, (continued)
- Re: Open source - Free software, Chris, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, AE, 2006/09/27
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software,
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <=
- Re: Open source - Free software, Jim Richardson, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Roger Johansson, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Oliver Wong, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Unruh, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Susan Bugher, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Susan Bugher, 2006/09/27