[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source - Free software
From: |
AE |
Subject: |
Re: Open source - Free software |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:37:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
XanaNews/1.18.1.3 |
v4vijayakumar wrote:
> ...
> Why the split, FSF and OSI? OSI is free, but why FSF is not open? :(
You can define an open source license that doesn't allow others to
distribute the derived work.
That way the sources can be compiled on different platforms, individual
adaptions can be done on the sources and bugs can be fixed individually
with or without telling you about it.
Nevertheless it's no free software.
- Re: Open source - Free software, (continued)
- Re: Open source - Free software, Chris, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, v4vijayakumar, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/28
- Re: Open source - Free software, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software,
AE <=
- Message not available
- Re: Open source - Free software, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Jim Richardson, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Roger Johansson, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Oliver Wong, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Barry Margolin, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Unruh, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, Susan Bugher, 2006/09/27
- Re: Open source - Free software, David Kastrup, 2006/09/27