Re: Open source - Free software

[Alexander Terekhov]

"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
[...]
> Which has nothing to do with why the NASA Open Source Agreement (NOSG)
> is a non-free license.  I suggest you read section G:
> 
> | G. Each Contributor represents that that its Modification is
> |    believed to be Contributor's original creation and does not
> |    violate any existing agreements, regulations, statutes or rules,
> |    and further that Contributor has sufficient rights to grant the
> |    rights conveyed by this Agreement.
> 
> I.e. I am not allowed to take code that I have not created and combine
> it with a program which is licensed under the NOSG.

When you take third party code and combine that code with NOSA'd code, 
it is neither modification nor Modification, retard.

Read all about "Larger Work" as spelled in both DEFINITIONS and 
OBLIGATIONS OF RECIPIENT sections in

http://opensource.org/licenses/nasa1.3.php

idiot.

regards,
alexander.